| 1 | '''Mukha Mukham''' |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | aka Face to Face |
| 5 | 1984 106’ col Malayalam |
| 6 | d/s Adoor Gopalakrishnan |
| 7 | p K. Ravindranathan Nair pc General Pics c Ravi |
| 8 | Varma m M.B. Srinivasan |
| 9 | lp P. Ganga, Balan K. Nair, Kaviyoor |
| 10 | Ponnamma, Krishna Kumar, Karamana |
| 11 | Janardanan Nair, Thilakan, Vishwanathan, |
| 12 | Ashokan, Lalitha, Vembayam, Krishnankutty |
| 13 | Nair, John Samuel, Shanmugham Pillan, Thambi |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Gopalakrishnan’s melodrama that opened up a |
| 17 | new direction in the genre in Malayalam film |
| 18 | while looking at the unpalatable aspects of |
| 19 | radical populism in Kerala. The first part is set |
| 20 | in the 1945-55 period just prior to the shortlived |
| 21 | 1957 CPI electoral victory in the State. The |
| 22 | 2nd part is ten years later, after 1964, when the |
| 23 | CPI split in two, later fragmenting even further. |
| 24 | The central character is Sridharan (Ganga), a |
| 25 | trade union leader who plays a key role in |
| 26 | winning a strike against mechanisation. He is |
| 27 | mercilessly beaten by thugs and has to go |
| 28 | underground. This episode is told from the |
| 29 | point of view of an idealist radical, Sudhakaran |
| 30 | (Vishwanathan as a boy, Ashokan as a man). |
| 31 | Years later, the old radicals have made their |
| 32 | compromises and Sridharan has become a |
| 33 | legendary emblem of integrity on whom the |
| 34 | defeated survivors have projected their |
| 35 | erstwhile radicalism. When he returns, there |
| 36 | follows bitter disappointment at the discovery |
| 37 | of the legendary hero’s human weaknesses. His |
| 38 | name is invoked by all factions as a rallying |
| 39 | cry, making his presence all the more |
| 40 | embarrassing. One day, he is found killed. With |
| 41 | the man safely out of the way, his image can |
| 42 | once again be mobilised, untarnished by the |
| 43 | complexities of real life. Violently attacked by |
| 44 | the CPI(M) establishment in Kerala, the film |
| 45 | works on several layers: in critiquing the state’s |
| 46 | left establishment it also critically evokes a |
| 47 | tradition of political melodrama in Kerala (cf. |
| 48 | Thoppil Bhasi’s scripts). It suggests that its |
| 49 | protagonist in all his roles - fiery leader, spent |
| 50 | force, political legend - is inescapably reduced |
| 51 | into stereotypical functioning, in the popular |
| 52 | melodramatic sense, of one kind or another. |
| 53 | The film thereby shifts the entire critique into |
| 54 | one where the mass culture generated by |
| 55 | incomplete capitalist growth merges with the |
| 56 | rhetoric of left activism, the whole masking |
| 57 | what the director suggests to be the major |
| 58 | problem: the absence of a valid indigenous |
| 59 | culture able to define the terms of its |
| 60 | engagement with capitalist systems. |
| 61 | |
| 62 | [[Film]] |