| 1 | '''Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge''' |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | 1995 192’ col/scope Hindi |
| 5 | d/s Aditya Chopra p Yash Chopra dial Javed |
| 6 | Siddiqui lyr Anand Bakshi c Manmohan Singh |
| 7 | m Jatin-Lalit |
| 8 | lp Kajol, Shah Rukh Khan, Farida Jalal, |
| 9 | Amrish Puri, Anupam Kher, Satish Shah |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | 1995’s top-grossing Hindi film following on from |
| 13 | the successful Hum Aapke Hain Koun ... ! |
| 14 | (1994). Choudhury Baldev Singh (Puri) is a |
| 15 | London-based newsagent pining for his native |
| 16 | Punjab. He wants to return to his roots by |
| 17 | forcing his daughter Simran (Kajol) to marry |
| 18 | the son of his old friend (Shah), whom neither |
| 19 | has met for 20 years. Simran goes on a |
| 20 | European tour before going to India, but there |
| 21 | she meets and falls for Raj (Khan). This causes |
| 22 | her tyrannical father to uproot his family |
| 23 | overnight and return to Punjab, where he is |
| 24 | received by dancing peasants in waving paddy |
| 25 | fields. However, Raj turns up there and |
| 26 | promises to rescue Simran from her intended |
| 27 | marriage, but only with the approval of their |
| 28 | respective parents. To achieve this, he inveigles |
| 29 | himself into the household under a range of |
| 30 | masquerades and false promises, until, having |
| 31 | made the scheduled marriage impossible, he |
| 32 | wins the girl from her reluctant father. As with |
| 33 | HAHK, this film also allows for a limited space |
| 34 | within the terms of a feudal patriarchy where |
| 35 | young people may aspire to a kind of watereddown |
| 36 | version of modern subjectivity, |
| 37 | represented in consumerist terms, before |
| 38 | ‘returning to the fold’. An alternative reading of |
| 39 | the film could see it as chronicling the hero’s |
| 40 | passage from British-Asian diaspora into |
| 41 | traditional Indian patriarchy, with the love story |
| 42 | (despite the film’s slogan, ‘Come, fall in love!’) |
| 43 | simply sugar-coating the prescription. A |
| 44 | remarkable feature of the film is the elimination |
| 45 | of e.g. the staple Bachchan formula of the |
| 46 | State as a contested site, being replaced here by |
| 47 | an unproblematic subsumption of feudal |
| 48 | patriarchy into ‘postmodern’ globalisation and |
| 49 | the selling of ‘authentic’ identity as something |
| 50 | that can only be achieved via consumerism. |
| 51 | |
| 52 | [[Film]] |